<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Applications for Teachers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itmoves.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/web-applications-for-teachers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itmoves.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/web-applications-for-teachers/</link>
	<description>Adventures In Teaching and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BlogTeacher</title>
		<link>http://itmoves.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/web-applications-for-teachers/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogTeacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itmoves.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/web-applications-for-teachers/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Looks interesting.  Added to my list of &quot;stuff to try when I&#039;ve got time&quot;.

The point you make about the investment of time to try things out and the risk of getting &quot;fragmented&quot; with different tools to do similar things all over the place is a valid one.

Not sure what can be done to overcome that.  Sometimes I think it&#039;s better to settle for &quot;not quite perfect at the moment but will do&quot;.

Once you&#039;re using something (anything!) I think you start to realise what other features you&#039;d want and would use, and then it&#039;s worth looking around a bit more.

The feature sets on some of these web 2.0 applications often looks good and then you end up using only a fraction of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks interesting.  Added to my list of &#8220;stuff to try when I&#8217;ve got time&#8221;.</p>
<p>The point you make about the investment of time to try things out and the risk of getting &#8220;fragmented&#8221; with different tools to do similar things all over the place is a valid one.</p>
<p>Not sure what can be done to overcome that.  Sometimes I think it&#8217;s better to settle for &#8220;not quite perfect at the moment but will do&#8221;.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;re using something (anything!) I think you start to realise what other features you&#8217;d want and would use, and then it&#8217;s worth looking around a bit more.</p>
<p>The feature sets on some of these web 2.0 applications often looks good and then you end up using only a fraction of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
